Part of a series on |
The Bible |
---|
Biblical canon and books |
Old Testament (OT) New Testament (NT) Hebrew Bible Deuterocanon Antilegomena Chapters and verses |
Development and authorship |
Jewish canon Old Testament canon New Testament canon Mosaic authorship Pauline epistles Johannine works Petrine epistles |
Translations and manuscripts |
Septuagint Samaritan Torah Dead Sea scrolls Masoretic text Targums · Peshitta Vetus Latina · Vulgate Gothic Bible · Luther Bible English Bibles |
Biblical studies |
Dating the Bible Biblical criticism Higher criticism Textual criticism Canonical criticism Novum Testamentum Graece Documentary hypothesis Synoptic problem NT textual categories Historicity
Internal consistencyPeople · Places · Names Archeology · Artifacts Science and the Bible |
Interpretation |
Hermeneutics Pesher · Midrash · Pardes Allegorical interpretation Literalism Prophecy |
Perspectives |
Gnostic · Islamic · Qur'anic Christianity and Judaism Biblical law
Inerrancy · Infallibilityin Judaism · in Christianity Criticism of the Bible |
· Book:Bible |
A Biblical canon, or canon of scripture,[1] is a list of books considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular religious community, generally in Judaism or Christianity. The term itself was first coined by Christians,[2] but the idea is found in Jewish sources. The internal wording of the text can also be specified, for example the Masoretic Text is the canonical text for Judaism.
The canons listed below are usually considered "closed" (i.e., books cannot be added or removed),[3] reflecting a belief that public revelation has ended and thus the inspired texts may be gathered into a complete and authoritative canon.[4] By contrast, an "open canon" permits the addition of additional books through the process of continuous revelation.
These canonical books have been developed through debate and agreement by the religious authorities of their respective faiths. Believers consider these canonical books to be inspired by God or to express the authoritative history of the relationship between God and His people. Books, such as the Jewish-Christian Gospels, excluded from the canon are considered non-canonical, but many disputed books considered non-canonical or even apocryphal by some are considered Biblical apocrypha or Deuterocanonical or fully canonical by others. There are differences between the Jewish and Christian Biblical canons, and between the canons of different Christian denominations. The differing criteria and processes of canonization dictate what the communities regard as the inspired books.
Contents
|
The word "canon" is derived from the Greek noun κανών "kanon" meaning "reed" or "cane," or also "rule" or "measure," which itself is derived from the Hebrew word קנה "kaneh" and is often used as a standard of measurement. Thus, a "canonical text" is a single authoritative edition for a given work. The establishing of a canonical text may involve an editorial selection from biblical manuscript traditions with varying interdependence. Early manuscript versions of the Hebrew Bible are represented in different languages such as the Greek Septuagint, the Aramaic Targums and Syriac Peshitta, the Samaritan Pentateuch, and the Hebrew Masoretic Text.
New Testament Greek and Latin are sometimes found in the same manuscript called a diglot text, with Greek and Latin on facing pages. New Testament manuscript traditions include the Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Bezae, Codex Alexandrinus, Textus Receptus, Vetus Latina, Vulgate and others.
Part of a series on | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Judaism | |||
Portal | Category | |||
Jewish religious movements | |||
Orthodox (Haredi · Hasidic · Modern) | |||
Conservative · Reform | |||
Karaite · Reconstructionist · Renewal · Humanistic | |||
Jewish philosophy | |||
Principles of faith · Kabbalah · Messiah · Ethics | |||
Chosenness · Names of God · Musar | |||
Religious texts | |||
Tanakh (Torah · Nevi'im · Ketuvim) | |||
Ḥumash · Siddur · Piyutim · Zohar | |||
Rabbinic literature (Talmud · Midrash · Tosefta) | |||
Religious Law | |||
Mishneh Torah · Tur | |||
Shulchan Aruch · Mishnah Berurah | |||
Kashrut · Tzniut · Tzedakah · Niddah · Noahide laws | |||
Holy cities | |||
Jerusalem · Safed · Hebron · Tiberias | |||
Important figures | |||
Abraham · Isaac · Jacob | |||
Moses · Aaron · David · Solomon | |||
Sarah · Rebecca · Rachel · Leah | |||
Rabbinic sages | |||
Jewish life cycle | |||
Brit · Pidyon haben · Bar/Bat Mitzvah | |||
Marriage · Bereavement | |||
Religious roles | |||
Rabbi · Rebbe · Posek · Hazzan/Cantor | |||
Dayan · Rosh yeshiva · Mohel · Kohen/Priest | |||
Religious buildings & institutions | |||
Synagogue · Beth midrash · Mikveh | |||
Sukkah · Chevra kadisha | |||
Holy Temple / Tabernacle | |||
Jewish education | |||
Yeshiva · Kollel · Cheder | |||
Religious articles | |||
Sefer Torah · Tallit · Tefillin · Tzitzit · Kippah | |||
Mezuzah · Hanukiah/Menorah · Shofar | |||
4 Species · Kittel · Gartel | |||
Jewish prayers and services | |||
Shema · Amidah · Aleinu · Kaddish · Minyan | |||
Birkat Hamazon · Shehecheyanu · Hallel | |||
Havdalah · Tachanun · Kol Nidre · Selichot | |||
Judaism & other religions | |||
Christianity · Islam · Judeo-Christian | |||
Abrahamic faiths · Pluralism · Others | |||
Related topics | |||
Antisemitism · Criticism · Holocaust · Israel · Zionism | |||
Rabbinic Judaism recognizes the twenty-four books of the Masoretic Text, commonly called the Tanakh or "Hebrew Bible". Evidence suggests that the process of canonization occurred between 200 BC and AD 200, indeed a popular position is that the Torah was canonized circa 400 BC, the Prophets circa 200 BC, and the Writings circa AD 100[5] perhaps at a hypothetical Council of Jamnia—however this position is increasingly criticised by modern scholars. The book of Deuteronomy includes a prohibition against adding or subtracting (4:2, 12:32) which might apply to the book itself (i.e. a "closed book", a prohibition against future scribal editing) or to the instruction received by Moses on Mt. Sinai.[6] The book of 2 Maccabees, itself not a part of the Jewish canon, describes Nehemiah (around 400 BC) as having "founded a library and collected books about the kings and prophets, and the writings of David, and letters of kings about votive offerings" (2:13-15). The Book of Nehemiah suggests that the priest-scribe Ezra brought the Torah back from Babylon to Jerusalem and the Second Temple (8-9) around the same time period. Both I and II Maccabees suggest that Judas Maccabeus (around 167 BC) likewise collected sacred books (3:42-50, 2:13-15, 15:6-9), indeed some scholars argue that the Jewish canon was fixed by the Hasmonean dynasty.[7] However, these primary sources do not suggest that the canon was at that time closed; moreover, it is not clear that these sacred books were identical to those that later became part of the canon. "The Men of the Great Assembly", also known as the Great Synagogue, was, according to Jewish tradition, an assembly of 120 scribes, sages, and prophets, in the period from the end of the Biblical prophets to the time of the development of Rabbinic Judaism, marking a transition from an era of prophets to an era of Rabbis. They lived in a period of about two centuries ending c. 70 CE.[1]
Among the developments in Judaism that are attributed to them are the fixing of the Jewish Biblical canon, including the books of Ezekiel, Daniel, Esther, and the Twelve Minor Prophets; the introduction of the triple classification of the oral law, dividing the study of the Mishnah (in the larger sense) into the three branches of midrash, halakot, and aggadot; the introduction of the Feast of Purim; and the institution of the prayer known as the Shemoneh 'Esreh as well as the synagogal prayers, rituals, and benedictions.
The Samaritan Torah, another version of the Torah in the Samaritan alphabet, also exists. This text is associated with the Samaritans, a people of whom the Jewish Encyclopedia[8] states: "Their history as a distinct community begins with the taking of Samaria by the Assyrians in 722 B.C."
Its relationship to the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint is still disputed. Scrolls among the Dead Sea scrolls have been identified as proto-Samaritan Pentateuch text-type.[9]
The Samaritans accept the Torah but do not accept any other parts of the Bible, probably a position also held by the Sadducees.[10] They did not expand their canon by adding any Samaritan compositions.
Both texts from the Church Fathers and old Samaritan texts provide us with reasons for the limited extent of the Samaritan Canon. According to some of the information the Samaritans parted with the Jews (Judeans) at such an early date that only the books of Moses were considered holy; according to other sources the group intentionally rejected the Prophets and (possibly) the other Scriptures and entrenched themselves in the Law of Moses.
The small community of the remnants of the Samaritans in Palestine includes their version of the Torah in their canon.[11] The Samaritan community possesses a copy of the Torah that they believe to have been penned by Abisha, a grandson of Aaron.
The Biblical canon is the set of books Christians regard as divinely inspired and thus constituting the Christian Bible.
Marcion of Sinope was the first Christian, albeit heretical, leader in recorded history to propose and delineate a canon (about 140 AD) which included 10 epistles from St. Paul as well as parts of the Gospel of Luke which today is known as the Gospel of Marcion. In so doing, he established a particular way of looking at religious texts that persists in Christian thought today. After Marcion, Christians began to divide texts into those that aligned well with the "measuring stick" ("canon" is the Greek translation of this phrase) of accepted theological thought and those that promoted heresy. This played a major role in finalizing the structure of the collection of works called the Bible. The initial impetus for the proto-orthodox Christian project of canonization flowed from opposition to the canonization of Marcion.
Though the Early Church used the Old Testament according to the canon of the Septuagint (LXX),[12] the apostles did not otherwise leave a defined set of new scriptures; instead the New Testament developed over time.
The writings attributed to the apostles circulated amongst the earliest Christian communities. The Pauline epistles were circulating in collected forms by the end of the first century AD. Justin Martyr, in the early second century, mentions the "memoirs of the apostles," which Christians called "gospels" and which were regarded as on par with the Old Testament.[13]
The first major figure to codify the Biblical canon was Origen of Alexandria. He was a scholar well educated in the realm of both theology and pagan philosophy. Origen decided to make his canon include all of the books in the current Catholic canon except for four books: James, 2nd Peter, and 2nd and 3rd epistles of John[14]. He also included the Shepherd of Hermas which was later rejected. The religious scholar Bruce Metzger described Origen's efforts, saying “The process of canonization represented by Origen proceeded by way of selection, moving from many candidates for inclusion to fewer.”[15] This was the first major attempt at the compilation of certain books and letters as authoritative and inspired teaching for the Catholic Church at the time.
Needless to say there are various theologians of the 2nd and 3rd centuries that wrote a great deal of works and used the letters of the apostles as foundation and justification for their own personal beliefs. However, there was still the problem of the Roman Empire, and while the persecutions of the Roman Empire were many and extreme, the persecution still occurred and possibly interfered with the initial canonization of the New Testament. This period in church history writings is known as the "Edificatory Period" and was followed by the "Apologetic", "Polemical" and "Scientific" Periods. Some of the Christian writers of this edificatory Period are: Irenaus, Hippolytus, Tertullian, Cyprian, Justin Martyr, Clement of Rome. This stagnation of official writings lead to a sudden explosion of discussions after Constantine I legalized Christianity in the early 4th century.
A four gospel canon (the Tetramorph) was asserted by Irenaeus, c. 160.[16] By the early 200s, Origen of Alexandria may have been using the same 27 books found in modern New Testament editions, though there were still disputes over the canonicity of Hebrews, James, II Peter, II and III John, and Revelation (see also Antilegomena).[17] Likewise by 200 the Muratorian fragment shows that there existed a set of Christian writings somewhat similar to what is now the New Testament, which included four gospels and argued against objections to them.[18] Thus, while there was a good measure of debate in the Early Church over the New Testament canon, the major writings were accepted by almost all Christians by the middle of the third century.[19]
In his Easter letter of 367, Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, gave a list of exactly the same books that would become the New Testament canon,[20] and he used the phrase "being canonized" (kanonizomena) in regards to them.[21] Athanasius also included the Book of Baruch and the Letter of Jeremiah in his Bible. He also eliminated the book of Esther from his Bible.
The African Synod of Hippo, in 393, approved the New Testament, as it stands today, together with the Septuagint books, a decision that was repeated by Councils of Carthage in 397 and 419. These councils were under the authority of St. Augustine, who regarded the canon as already closed.[22] Pope Damasus I's Council of Rome in 382, if the Decretum Gelasianum is correctly associated with it, issued a biblical canon identical to that mentioned above,[20] or if not the list is at least a sixth century compilation.[23] Likewise, Damasus' commissioning of the Latin Vulgate edition of the Bible, c. 383, was instrumental in the fixation of the canon in the West.[24] In 405, Pope Innocent I sent a list of the sacred books to a Gallic bishop, Exsuperius of Toulouse. When these bishops and councils spoke on the matter, however, they were not defining something new, but instead "were ratifying what had already become the mind of the Church."[25] Thus, from the fourth century, there existed unanimity in the West concerning the New Testament canon (as it is today),[26] and by the fifth century the East, with a few exceptions, had come to accept the Book of Revelation and thus had come into harmony on the matter of the canon.[27]
Some Christian groups do not accept the theory that the Christian Bible was not known until various local and Ecumenical Councils, which they deem to be "Roman-dominated", made their official declarations. For example, the Ethiopian and Syriac Christian churches which did not participate in these councils developed their own Biblical traditions. These groups believe that, in spite of the disagreements about certain books in early Christianity and, indeed, still today, the New Testament supports the view that Paul (2 Timothy 4:11–13), Peter (2 Peter 3:15–16, although it seems that not all the Syriac Church Fathers accepted this book itself as canonical,[28] and indeed it appears the Syriac Bible initially lacked all of the Catholic epistles as well as John's Revelation), and ultimately John (Revelation 22:18–19, but see the previous note) finalized the canon of the New Testament. Some note that Peter, John, and Paul wrote 20 (or 21) of the 27 books of the NT and personally knew all the other NT writers. (The books which are attributed to authors other than these three are: Matthew, Mark, Luke, Acts, James, and Jude. The authorship of Hebrews has long been disputed.)
Martin Luther made an attempt to remove the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation from the canon (echoing the consensus of several Catholics, also labeled Christian Humanists — such as Cardinal Ximenez, Cardinal Cajetan, and Erasmus — and partially because they were perceived to go against certain Protestant doctrines such as sola scriptura and sola fide), but this was not generally accepted among his followers. However, these books are ordered last in the German-language Luther Bible to this day.[29]
Evangelicals tend not to accept the Septuagint as the inspired Hebrew Bible, though many recognize its wide use by Greek-speaking Jews in the first century. They note that early Christians evidenced a knowledge of a canon of Scripture, based upon internal evidence, as well as by the existence of a list of Old Testament books by Melito of Sardis, compiled around 170 A.D (see Melito's canon).
Many modern Protestants point to the following four "Criteria for Canonicity" to justify the selection of the books that have been included in the New Testament:
The basic factor for recognizing a book's canonicity for the New Testament was divine inspiration, and the chief test for this was apostolicity. The term "apostolic" as used for the test of canonicity does not necessarily mean apostolic authorship or derivation, but rather "apostolic authority". According to these Protestants, "apostolic authority" is never detached from the authority of the Lord. See Apostolic succession.
Full dogmatic articulations of the canons were not made until the Council of Trent of 1546 for Roman Catholicism,[30] the Thirty-Nine Articles of 1563 for the Church of England, the Westminster Confession of Faith of 1647 for British Calvinism, and the Synod of Jerusalem of 1672 for the Greek Orthodox.
Western Catholic Tradition | Eastern Orthodox Tradition | Oriental Orthodox Tradition | Nestorian Tradition | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Protestant | Roman Catholic | Greek Orthodox | Slavonic Orthodox | Georgian Orthodox | Armenian Apostolic[31] | Syriac Orthodox | Coptic Orthodox[32] | Ethiopian Orthodox[33] | Church of the East[34] |
Genesis | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Exodus | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Leviticus | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Numbers | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Deuteronomy | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Joshua | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Judges | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ruth | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Samuel | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Kings | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Chronicles | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Prayer of Manasseh | No | No (appendix) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ezra | Yes | Yes (1 Esdras) | Yes (Esdras B) | Yes (1 Esdras) | Yes (1 Ezra) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Nehemiah | Yes | Yes (2 Esdras) | Yes (Esdras B) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
1 Esdras | No | No (3 Esdras) | Yes (Esdras A) | Yes (2 Esdras) | Yes (2 Ezra) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
2 Esdras | No | No (4 Esdras) | No | No (3 Esdras) | Yes (3 Ezra) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Esther | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Additions to Esther | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Tobit | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Judith | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Job | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Psalms 1-150 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Psalm 151 | No | No (appendix) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Psalm 152-5 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No-some mss. | No | No | No-some mss. |
Lamentations | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Proverbs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ecclesiastes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Song of Songs | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Wisdom of Solomon | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sirach | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Isaiah | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Jeremiah | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Baruch | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Letter of Jeremiah | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
2 Baruch | No | No | No | No | No | No | No-some mss. | No | No | No-some mss. |
Letter of Baruch | No | No | No | No | No | No | No-some mss. | No | No | No-some mss. |
3 Baruch | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
4 Baruch | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Ezekiel | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Daniel | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Additions to Daniel | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Twelve Prophets | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
1 Maccabees | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
2 Maccabees | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
3 Maccabees | No | No (appendix) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No-some mss. | No | No | No-some mss. |
4 Maccabees | No | No (appendix) | No (appendix) | No (appendix) | Yes | No | No-some mss. | No | No | No-some mss. |
Enoch | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Jubilees | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
1-3 Meqabyan | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
The Ethiopian Orthodox Church has a few additional books in its canon: Jubilees, Book of Enoch, 4 Baruch along with three books of Meqabyan that are unique to their canon. Certain manuscripts from Syriac tradition also contain writings not found in other traditions, such as Psalms 152-155, 2 Baruch etc. In general, the position of Oriental Orthodox and Nestorian Churches on the so-called "apocryphal books" are less clear than their western counterparts.
In general, among Christian denominations, the New Testament Canon is an agreed-upon list of 27 books, although book order can vary.
Catholic, Protestant, E. Orthodox, and O. Orthodox |
Traditional Lutheran |
Traditional Syriac[35] |
Original Language (Koine Greek) |
Canonical Gospels | |||
Matthew | Matthew | Matthew | Greek (?)[36] |
Mark | Mark | Mark | Greek |
Luke | Luke | Luke | Greek |
John | John | John | Greek |
Apostolic History | |||
Acts | Acts | Acts | Greek |
Pauline Epistles | |||
Romans | Romans | Romans | Greek |
1 Corinthians | 1 Corinthians | 1 Corinthians | Greek |
2 Corinthians | 2 Corinthians | 2 Corinthians | Greek |
Galatians | Galatians | Galatians | Greek |
Ephesians | Ephesians | Ephesians | Greek |
Philippians | Philippians | Philippians | Greek |
Colossians | Colossians | Colossians | Greek |
1 Thessalonians | 1 Thessalonians | 1 Thessalonians | Greek |
2 Thessalonians | 2 Thessalonians | 2 Thessalonians | Greek |
1 Timothy | 1 Timothy | 1 Timothy | Greek |
2 Timothy | 2 Timothy | 2 Timothy | Greek |
Titus | Titus | Titus | Greek |
Philemon | Philemon | Philemon | Greek |
General Epistles | |||
Hebrews | Hebrews[L 1] | Hebrews | Greek (?)[37] |
James | James[L 1] | James | Greek |
1 Peter | 1 Peter | 1 Peter | Greek |
2 Peter | 2 Peter | Greek | |
1 John | 1 John | 1 John | Greek |
2 John | 2 John | Greek | |
3 John | 3 John | Greek | |
Jude | Jude[L 1] | Greek | |
Apocalypse | |||
Book of Revelation | Book of Revelation[L 1] | Greek |
The Peshitta excludes 2-3 John, 2 Peter, Jude, and Revelation, but Bibles of the modern Syriac Orthodox Church include later translations of those books along with the Letter of Baruch (sometimes included as part of 2 Baruch). Still today the official lectionary followed by the Syrian Orthodox Church (with headquarters at Kottayam (Kerala), and the Chaldean Syriac Church, also known as the Church of the East (Nestorian), with headquarters at Trichur (Kerala)) presents lessons from only the twenty-two books of Peshitta, the version to which appeal is made for the settlement of doctrinal questions.
The Third Epistle to the Corinthians and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs were once considered part of the Armenian Orthodox Bible, but are no longer printed with modern editions.
The New Testament has different orders in the Slavonic, Ethiopian, Syriac and Armenian traditions. Protestant Bibles in Russia and Ethiopia usually follow the local Orthodox order for the New Testament.
The Didache is also honored by Catholics, as is the Proto-Evangelion, although these books are not considered canonical.
The Standard Works of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) consists of several books that constitute its open scriptural canon, and include the following:
The Standard Works are printed and distributed by the LDS church in a single binding called a "Quadruple Combination" or a set of two books, with the Bible in one binding, and the other three books in a second binding called a "Triple Combination". Current editions of the standard works include a bible dictionary, photographs, maps and gazetteer, topical guide, index, footnotes, cross references, excerpts from the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible (JST) and other study aids.
|
|
|
|
|